Lexical analysis

A note on the metrics

The lexical analysis tab displays two lexical metrics; the Hypergeometric Density Distribution (HDD), and Type Token Ratios, both of which are calculated by the koRpus package in R.

Interpretation of metrics

It should be noted that Type Token Ratios are unreliable for short corpora, and are influenced by the overall length of the corpus. By contrast, HDD is much more reliable because it takes length into account.

In the koRpus manual, HDD is described as an analogue of VocD which is a widely used metric supported by the CLAN language analysis system. This metric, just like HDD automatically accounts for the length of the language sample. However, I have noted that HDDs for child language data differ quite a lot from what one would expect based on published norms for VocD (Durรกn, P., Malvern, D., Richards, B., & Chipere, N. (2004). Developmental Trends in Lexical Diversity. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 220โ€“242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.220). I am not sure what is happening here. There is some quite complex maths being used in the calculation of these metrics! (If someone has insights, do let me know)

Nonetheless, the HDD norms provided by MiMo Norms demonstrate a consistent developmental progression. Because of this, I would cautiously suggest that HDD norms could be used in conjunction with MiMo Norms.